Archive for the 'DC' Category

Yea! We Passed the House. Now What Do We Do?

Wednesday, April 25th, 2007

The high of the DC Voting Rights Act passing in the House has worn off and the reality of the uphill battle looming in the Senate has sunk in amongst the supporters of DC Voting Rights. And the fact that Joe Lieberman may not be in charge of the bill in the Senate is another reason some are nervous about the future.

What do we do now? Simple. We step up our game.

This fight reminds me when I was working on a campaign to stop nuclear waste from being dumped at Yucca Mountain in 2002. Running the standard playbook, we targeted the usual suspects with “the world is going to end” environmental messaging. The results were so-so. However, when we reached out to conservative/right-leaning lists with a “states rights” message (instead of the environment) the action rate was several times higher.

If this bill is going to pass the Senate, we’re going to need to reach out beyond the “latte-drinking, sushi-eating, Volvo-driving, New York Times-reading” liberal civil-rights crowd that has carried the water on this bill to date, and also reach out to the conservative media and interest groups and dangle the prospects of another Republican House seat (and, yes, electoral vote) for Utah in front of them.

It’s a basic segmentation of audience and message . . . not rocket science.

We are also going to need to:

  • Put grassroots and grasstops pressure on Bennett and Hatch from Utah citizens
  • Recruit, educate, and mobilize citizens in the states of the Senators whose committee(s) have jurisdiction over the bill
  • Figure out which Senators are on the fence and what will move them

Yes, it’s going to be fight. But I do think it’s one we can win.

Do you have ideas? Please comment using the links below, I’d love to hear from you.

DC Voting Rights Act Passes Full U.S. House

Thursday, April 19th, 2007

Today the U.S. House passed the DC Voting Rights Act. It was an historic day as it was the first time since the 70’s that the House has passed anything related to giving the District a full vote in the House. The bill passed 241 to 177, and the companion bill that would fund the new seat passed by a vote of 216 to 203.

I have to give credit to DC Vote, Jake Kemp, Congresswoman Norton, Congressman Tom Davis, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Together they the made sure this bill was re-introduced in this Congress, overcame the numerous hurdles thrown at it, and ensured it passed the necessary committees and the full House chamber.

I echo the statement made by Mayor Fenty:

“This is a great and historic day for the residents of the District of Columbia. I look forward to the continued success of the D.C. Voting Rights Act and urge the Senate to take up this important legislation immediately.”

The next steps are getting it through the Senate and, of course, getting the President to sign it. But for now the victory is the House is something to savor.

Vote in the House Tomorrow

Wednesday, April 18th, 2007

The DC Voting Rights Act is going back to the floor tomorrow. There’s going to be a new rule to stop the hijacking with the motion to recommit with instructions. It should pass tomorrow and then we’ll be on to the Senate.

Speaking of the Senate, I ran into Senator Tester (D-MT) at a YearlyKos fundraiser and he said he’s be a supporter of the bill in the Senate. I also got the ear of Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI)  at the event, and he is going to be a supporter as well….as he always has been.

Here is a article from CQ about tomorrow’s vote:

CQ TODAY
April 18, 2007 – 1:16 p.m.
D.C. Voting Bill To Be Considered Separately From Revenue Provision
By Richard Rubin and Michael Teitelbaum, CQ Staff

Democrats are maneuvering to avoid a repeat of the procedural tactic that stalled the District of Columbia voting representation bill last month.

This time around, the bill that would provide House representation for the District and an additional seat for Utah (HR 1905) will be separated from the revenue-raising provision (HR 1906) designed to cover the costs of expanding the House to 437 members and creating the two new seats.

The House Rules Committee was to meet Tuesday to discuss rules for both bills, which are slated for consideration on the House floor Thursday.

It was unclear exactly how the two-bill approach would avoid what occurred on March 22 when Rep. Lamar Smith , R-Texas, offered a motion that would have added language to severely curtail the District’s restrictive gun ban. The bills could be combined as they leave the House to comply with pay-as-you-go rules.

Smith’s motion was considered germane because a tax change in the original bill broadened the scope of the legislation. Rather than risk an embarrassing or politically controversial vote, Democrats then pulled the bill from the floor.

The new tax bill unveiled Thursday, sponsored by Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton , D-D.C., mirrors the revenue increase from the previous bill (HR 1433). It raises the required estimated tax payments for taxpayers earning more than $5 million annually. According to a preliminary estimate, the bill would generate $14 million over 10 years.

The new D.C. bill would not include any revenue increases.

Source: CQ Today
Round-the-clock coverage of news from Capitol Hill.
© 2007 Congressional Quarterly Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Voting Rights March Today!

Monday, April 16th, 2007

I’m writing another reminder to get ready to march in support of DC voting rights today.

The march is on rain or shine (or wind). . . so please be sure to dress appropriately. The meeting point is Freedom Plaza at 13th and Pennsylvania Avenues, NW at 2:30 p.m.

The best Metro stops are Metro Center or Federal Triangle.

After some quick speeches by Mayor Fenty, Chairman Gray, and Congresswoman Norton we’ll march down Pennsylvania Avenue to the Capitol and rally in support of efforts to give DC a real vote in the House of Representatives.

If you can’t get out of work to make the march, please consider leaving early and meet us at the Capitol reflecting pool at Pennsylvania and 3rd Street NW around 4:00.

We can’t have people sitting on the sidelines today! Please stand a stand for the District of Columbia and take to the streets. I’ll see you there!

Not All Republicans Are Bad

Friday, March 30th, 2007

I’ve been beating up on some House Republicans the last few days after the delay in passing the DC Voting Rights Act in the House. I would like to take this opportunity to point out for the record that not all members the GOP are plotting to deny DC the vote, and in fact some are actively fighting for us.

The first good-guy is Jack Kemp. This former Congressman, cabinet secretary, and vice-presidential candidate has been a steadfast supporter of DC voting rights. He recently published an article on TownHall.com entitled “Shortsighted House GOP would deny D.C. residents the vote“. In this article he states:

The Republicans in the House, as well as advisers to the president - by threatening a veto - are in danger not only of indifference to district citizens, but in fact they’re showing disdain for a city predominantly governed and populated by people of color. This can be interpreted as racially insensitive at best and racially prejudiced at worst. Either way, it’s really dumb politics because the party of Lincoln, Douglass, Grant, Eisenhower and Bush 41, among others, is sacrificing its civil rights soul for a mess of political pottage.

Jack Kemp is a respected leader in the conservative movement, so I hope these words will change some minds.

I also wanted to point out the the DC Republican Party has been out front on this bill and is working the issue with members of their own party in Congress. Here is a section of a press release they recently put out:

“We are going to fight for voting rights, because we are the party of Abraham Lincoln,” said Robert Kabel, Chairman of the D.C. Republican Party. “This is a bill written by a Republican Congressman, and it is the bi-partisan solution to a historic injustice. The American citizens of the District of Columbia pay their taxes, fight for their country and deserve equal rights.”

You can read the full press release here.

And lastly, I have to once again give a shout-out to Indiana Congressman Mike Pence for supporting this bill in committee. He didn’t have to that, there was really nothing in it for him, and it took guts to break ranks with his party to cast that vote.

If only there were more Republicans who embraced the whole “party of Lincoln” idea as more than a talking point…

Keep Informed

Sign up to keep on top of the Mike Panetta for Shadow Representative campaign. We won't sell, distribute, or otherwise abuse your info in any way besides giving you information related to the campaign. That's one campaign promise you can count on.